Lately, I discovered a good unit trust from an article that presented its ten years performance since 3-Jul-00 to 19-Aug-10. It is surprisingly its annualized return and standard deviation is much more better than my own portfolio. Let us name this unit trust as PSC.
Annualized Return = RATE((DATE(2010,8,19)-DATE(2000,7,3))/365.25,0,-1,4.0809) = 14.90% p.a.
So, I am introducing this unit trust to my current portfolio for the optimization.
Result:
A) Single Unit Trust
Expected Return: 2.95%, Standard Deviation: 3.21%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.8540
B) Current Optimized Portfolio
Expected Return: 3.30%, Standard Deviation: 2.35%, Sharpe Ratio: 1.3136
C) Introducing PSC into Current Optimized Portfolio
Expected Return: 3.34%, Standard Deviation: 2.16%, Sharpe Ratio: 1.4524
D) Actual Portfolio
Expected Return: 3.11%, Standard Deviation: 3.58%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.8097
Action 1:
What Happen if I relocate Genting to LPI and PIttikal to PSC?
Expected Return: 3.35%, Standard Deviation: 3.38%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.9304
Action 2:
What Happen if I relocate PIttikal to PSC?
Expected Return: 3.25%, Standard Deviation: 3.49%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.8695
Action 3:
What Happen if I relocate Genting and PIttikal to PSC?
Expected Return: 3.26%, Standard Deviation: 3.35%, Sharpe Ratio: 0.9095
Showing posts with label Investment Planning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Investment Planning. Show all posts
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Investment Planning: Asset Relocation 5 (Sharpe Optimization via Excel Solver)

This is the June-2010 Sharpe optimization.
Current Portfolio: Return = 3.28%, STDEV = 4.21%, Sharpe = 0.7471
Optimized Portfolio: Return = 3.44%, STDEV = 2.68%, Sharpe = 1.210
Solver improvement: Significant improvement on the STDEV results better sharpe ratio
Scenario 1: What happen if I invest EPF RM13,000 into PRSF?
Return = 3.22%, STDEV = 3.98%, Sharpe = 0.7573
No significant improvement on sharpe. However, EPF money is limited to invest in selected fund e.g. PRSF.
Scenario 2: What happen if I invest Cash RM13,000 into LPI?
Return = 3.30%, STDEV = 3.97%, Sharpe = 0.7773
No significant improvement on sharpe.
Scenario 3: What happen if I relocate RM13,000 from Genting to LPI?
Return = 3.38%, STDEV = 3.98%, Sharpe = 0.7960
No significant improvement on sharpe.
Scenario 4: what if I follow as per optimized?
Return = 3.44%, STDEV = 2.68%, Sharpe = 1.210
Significant improvement on sharpe. The result gives me a shock. 5-component-portfolio gives a better sharpe ratio than 13-component-portfolio. I might make a lot of mistakes that believe on investing more stocks will dilute the risk as the number of stock increases. My possible mistake in the past may be adding too many components that not really "diluting" the risk.
As I learn from here, risk-return research must be studied after the stock picking from fundamental selection. It is because you never know the characteristic of your good fundamental stock in helping the risk dilution or risk concentration.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Investment Planning: Asset Relocation 4
4 types of believer views return-to-risk ratio.
1) Risk adverse - believe in risk free investment is the most secure investment in the universe.
Portfolio characteristic/Solver key constrains: lowest standard deviation

2) Risk taker - believe in high risk high gain and no risk no gain.
Portfolio characteristic/Solver key constrains: highest return, 100% concentration to one counter
3) Risk optimize - believe in statistical optimization in portfolio.
Portfolio characteristic/Solver key constrains: highest sharpe ratio, (averagereturnrate - riskfreerate)/standarddeviation
4) LUCK - believe in supernatural, windfall, random or trial-and-error
Portfolio characteristic: random, no plan or fortune teller.
Conclusion:
1) Risk adverse - believe in risk free investment is the most secure investment in the universe.
Portfolio characteristic/Solver key constrains: lowest standard deviation

2) Risk taker - believe in high risk high gain and no risk no gain.
Portfolio characteristic/Solver key constrains: highest return, 100% concentration to one counter

Portfolio characteristic/Solver key constrains: highest sharpe ratio, (averagereturnrate - riskfreerate)/standarddeviation

Portfolio characteristic: random, no plan or fortune teller.
Conclusion:
Portfolio Risk | Portfolio Return | Sharpe Ratio | |
Risk Adverse | 2.4% | 0.8% | 0.2479 |
Risk Taker | 12.6% | 6.1% | 0.4690 |
Risk Optimize | 3.8% | 3.3% | 0.8090 |

Labels:
Asset Relocation,
Investment Planning,
return,
risk,
Sharpe Ratio,
Solver
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Investment Planning: Asset Relocation 3
1st Step: Collect historical adjusted price from Yahoo Finance. Adjusted price is the corrected price after considering the dividend and share split. You need to spend some time in evaluating the reliability of the adjusted price in the event of after share split.

Table 2: Variance and Covariance Matrix for the Portfolio
Step 2: Variance and covariance calculation.

3rd step: Calculation portfolio weightage. Then calculate Portfolio Return (current), Portfolio Return (optimized) and Sharpe Ratio.
Next time I will discuss about the implication of the model with different scenario.
Labels:
Asset Relocation,
Investment Planning,
Sharpe Ratio,
Solver
Saturday, May 8, 2010
Investment Planning: Asset Relocation 2
Let us take the 5 stocks as example for two methods of asset relocation.
First method:
The first method was shown in the previous blog titled "Investment Planning: Asset Relocation".
Scenario:
10-month-performances for five stocks were tabulated as a study case.
Stock i average return = AVERAGE(array stock i)
Stock i standard deviation = STDEV(array stock i)
Risk free rate = 2.5%/12 = 0.21% per month
Desired return = 2.5% per month
Sharpe Ratio = (Average Return - Risk Free)/Standard Deviation
Sharpe Ratio in lowest to highest order:
GenM,Haio,NTPM,Pbbank,LPI
Excel Solver Constraints:
Constraint#1: optimized weightage <=1 Constraint#2: desired return per month = 2.5% Constraint#3: sum of optimized weightage = 1 Current invested or value weight:
GenM : HaiO : NTPM : PbBank : LPI = 0.21 : 17.2 : 25.6 : 51.9 : 3.2
Excel Solver optimized weightage:
GenM : HaiO : NTPM : PbBank : LPI = 0.58 : 19.56 : 15.44 : 33.02 : 31.4
Reference of Relocation from Method 1 optimization:
Strategy 1: reduce GenM weightage or sell off all
Strategy 2: reduce high weightage of Pbbank and NTPM
Strategy 3: increase LPI weightage
Action recommended:
1. Stop buying GenM, Pbbank and NTPM. Extra cash is used to buy HaiO and LPI.
Second Method:
This is the second method which takes into account of standard deviation.
Variance stock i = VARP(Array stock i)
Covariance stock i to j = COV(Array stock i, Array stock j)
Variance Term stock i = Stock i weightage*SUMPRODUCT(Array weightage, Array COV or/and VARP)
Portfolio variance = Summation of all variance term stock
Portfolio standard deviation = SQRT(profolio variance)
Excel Solver constraint:
Constraint#1: Optimized weightage >=0
Constraint#2: desired retrurn = 2.5% per month
Constraint#3: sum of optimized weightage = 1


Current invested or value weight:
GenM : HaiO : NTPM : PbBank : LPI = 0.21 : 17.2 : 25.6 : 51.9 : 3.2
Current portfolio return: 2.05%
Current portfolio standard deviation: 4.13%
Current portfolio Sharpe ratio = (2.05-0.21)/4.13 = 0.4455
Excel Solver optimized weightage:
GenM : HaiO : NTPM : PbBank : LPI = 7.39 : 3.1 : 15.35 : 31.78 : 42.38
Optimized portfolio return: 2.5%
Optimized portfolio standard deviation: 2.03%
Optimized portfolio Sharpe ratio = (2.5-0.21)/2.03 = 1.128
Conclusion:
Method 2 has a big different perspective in relating risk and return relationship. Our common sense that applied at Method 1 is beaten down by the statistical approaches.
Method 1: GenM(hold), HaiO(increase), NTPM(decrease), PbBank(decrease), LPI(increase)
Method 2: GenM(increase), HaiO(decrease). NTPM(decrease), PbBank(decrease), LPI(increase)
Thanks to the Markowitz,s CAPM for a better understanding on the risk and return relationship.
First method:
The first method was shown in the previous blog titled "Investment Planning: Asset Relocation".
Scenario:
10-month-performances for five stocks were tabulated as a study case.
Stock i average return = AVERAGE(array stock i)
Stock i standard deviation = STDEV(array stock i)
Risk free rate = 2.5%/12 = 0.21% per month
Desired return = 2.5% per month
Sharpe Ratio = (Average Return - Risk Free)/Standard Deviation
Sharpe Ratio in lowest to highest order:
GenM
Excel Solver Constraints:
Constraint#1: optimized weightage <=1 Constraint#2: desired return per month = 2.5% Constraint#3: sum of optimized weightage = 1 Current invested or value weight:
GenM : HaiO : NTPM : PbBank : LPI = 0.21 : 17.2 : 25.6 : 51.9 : 3.2
Excel Solver optimized weightage:
GenM : HaiO : NTPM : PbBank : LPI = 0.58 : 19.56 : 15.44 : 33.02 : 31.4
Reference of Relocation from Method 1 optimization:
Strategy 1: reduce GenM weightage or sell off all
Strategy 2: reduce high weightage of Pbbank and NTPM
Strategy 3: increase LPI weightage
Action recommended:
1. Stop buying GenM, Pbbank and NTPM. Extra cash is used to buy HaiO and LPI.

This is the second method which takes into account of standard deviation.
Variance stock i = VARP(Array stock i)
Covariance stock i to j = COV(Array stock i, Array stock j)
Variance Term stock i = Stock i weightage*SUMPRODUCT(Array weightage, Array COV or/and VARP)
Portfolio variance = Summation of all variance term stock
Portfolio standard deviation = SQRT(profolio variance)
Excel Solver constraint:
Constraint#1: Optimized weightage >=0
Constraint#2: desired retrurn = 2.5% per month
Constraint#3: sum of optimized weightage = 1


Current invested or value weight:
GenM : HaiO : NTPM : PbBank : LPI = 0.21 : 17.2 : 25.6 : 51.9 : 3.2
Current portfolio return: 2.05%
Current portfolio standard deviation: 4.13%
Current portfolio Sharpe ratio = (2.05-0.21)/4.13 = 0.4455
Excel Solver optimized weightage:
GenM : HaiO : NTPM : PbBank : LPI = 7.39 : 3.1 : 15.35 : 31.78 : 42.38
Optimized portfolio return: 2.5%
Optimized portfolio standard deviation: 2.03%
Optimized portfolio Sharpe ratio = (2.5-0.21)/2.03 = 1.128
Conclusion:
Method 2 has a big different perspective in relating risk and return relationship. Our common sense that applied at Method 1 is beaten down by the statistical approaches.
Method 1: GenM(hold), HaiO(increase), NTPM(decrease), PbBank(decrease), LPI(increase)
Method 2: GenM(increase), HaiO(decrease). NTPM(decrease), PbBank(decrease), LPI(increase)
Thanks to the Markowitz,s CAPM for a better understanding on the risk and return relationship.
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Investment Planning: Asset Relocation
Investment planning is the optimization of the Ong’s portfolio accordingly to the Ong’s risk profile.
From the net worth statement, the investible items are sorted as below. Due to the weight of the different classes of the investment tool, the return of the portfolio is calculated by using this formula:
Example:
Return formula:
Saving account return: (New – Old)/Old
Fixed Deposits return: (New – Old)/Old
Share: (New – Old + dividend)/Old
Unit trust: (New – Old + distribution)/Old
Whole Life Cash Value: (New – Old + Bonus)/Old, for cash value accumulation, not the total premium
Investment-linked product: (New – Old + distribution)/Old, in the investment allocation, not the total premium
EPF: Declaration by EPF during financial year end
Saving account: risk free rate, said 2.5% is higher than 0.9%. It is not worth to park money into it. However, it is only served as cash for emergency. It is recommended to transfer it all to fixed deposits account. Alternatively, if Ong has credit card with the credit limit of RM 20,000, thus he has no worry in holding so much cash in the saving account. He can park the money to higher return investment tool.
Fixed Deposit: Best method to curb the inflation rate. It is at very low risk, low return but very secure. Thus, it serves as emergency fund. If Ong has bought life, personal accident and hospitalization & surgical insurance for all his family members (parents, children and spouse), the amount shall be reduced to RM 15,000.
Share: Highest return doesn’t mean to be the best share. For financial planning, Sharpe ratio is used to gauge the performance of the investment tool. Consistency in generating the expected return is the first choice of the plan. Thus, to increase the portfolio return, switching from share#1, share#2, and share#4 to share#1 can drastically increase the share portfolio return. However, 2 to 3 shares shall be recommended in order to reduce the systematic risk or market risk. If possible, regional good share shall be recommended in order to reduce the systematic risk.
Unit trust: Does your UT agent provide the analysis before advising you to switch your fund from one to another? UT is a very diversify product, it is not recommended to have too many type of UT. Thus, Unit trust#1 and Unit trust#2 shall be allocated to unit trust#3. The consistency of the return has higher possibility to achieve financial goal.
Whole Life cash value: Traditional insurance product does a better security as the insurance company has to strictly follow Bank Negara guideline. The cash value from the whole life serves as the final resource of the liquid cash for Ong. This investment component in the insurance has a good cash value that always has higher return than the fixed deposits.
Investment-linked product: Choosing the unit trust by the insured is under insured liability. It does not have a better security as whole life insurance. Regular premium investment-linked product has a very low unit trust allocation that erodes the ability of the asset growth. The objective of the investment shall be studies before making any decision. Single premium investment-linked product has a higher ratio (e.g. 1.2 times, 1.25 times) compared with unit trust that coupled with free insurance (e.g. 1.0 times). However, Sharpe ratio shall be used to make the decision.
EPF: EPF is the best tool for retirement. With no confident that you can generate a higher return from the withdrawal, then you better not to withdraw it for investment, housing loan reduction, education etc. Most Malaysian “invests” in their children as the safety net for his retirement. What if the safety net fails to commit to return your retirement income? If you are an employee, you may request HR to divert your annual increment to EPF contribution (max 19% for tax exemption). This is a way of conversion from taxable income to non-taxable income in order to reduce your tax.
Diverted original posting from my facebook note dated 21-Nov-09.
From the net worth statement, the investible items are sorted as below. Due to the weight of the different classes of the investment tool, the return of the portfolio is calculated by using this formula:
Example:
Return formula:
Saving account return: (New – Old)/Old
Fixed Deposits return: (New – Old)/Old
Share: (New – Old + dividend)/Old
Unit trust: (New – Old + distribution)/Old
Whole Life Cash Value: (New – Old + Bonus)/Old, for cash value accumulation, not the total premium
Investment-linked product: (New – Old + distribution)/Old, in the investment allocation, not the total premium
EPF: Declaration by EPF during financial year end
Saving account: risk free rate, said 2.5% is higher than 0.9%. It is not worth to park money into it. However, it is only served as cash for emergency. It is recommended to transfer it all to fixed deposits account. Alternatively, if Ong has credit card with the credit limit of RM 20,000, thus he has no worry in holding so much cash in the saving account. He can park the money to higher return investment tool.
Fixed Deposit: Best method to curb the inflation rate. It is at very low risk, low return but very secure. Thus, it serves as emergency fund. If Ong has bought life, personal accident and hospitalization & surgical insurance for all his family members (parents, children and spouse), the amount shall be reduced to RM 15,000.
Share: Highest return doesn’t mean to be the best share. For financial planning, Sharpe ratio is used to gauge the performance of the investment tool. Consistency in generating the expected return is the first choice of the plan. Thus, to increase the portfolio return, switching from share#1, share#2, and share#4 to share#1 can drastically increase the share portfolio return. However, 2 to 3 shares shall be recommended in order to reduce the systematic risk or market risk. If possible, regional good share shall be recommended in order to reduce the systematic risk.
Unit trust: Does your UT agent provide the analysis before advising you to switch your fund from one to another? UT is a very diversify product, it is not recommended to have too many type of UT. Thus, Unit trust#1 and Unit trust#2 shall be allocated to unit trust#3. The consistency of the return has higher possibility to achieve financial goal.
Whole Life cash value: Traditional insurance product does a better security as the insurance company has to strictly follow Bank Negara guideline. The cash value from the whole life serves as the final resource of the liquid cash for Ong. This investment component in the insurance has a good cash value that always has higher return than the fixed deposits.
Investment-linked product: Choosing the unit trust by the insured is under insured liability. It does not have a better security as whole life insurance. Regular premium investment-linked product has a very low unit trust allocation that erodes the ability of the asset growth. The objective of the investment shall be studies before making any decision. Single premium investment-linked product has a higher ratio (e.g. 1.2 times, 1.25 times) compared with unit trust that coupled with free insurance (e.g. 1.0 times). However, Sharpe ratio shall be used to make the decision.
EPF: EPF is the best tool for retirement. With no confident that you can generate a higher return from the withdrawal, then you better not to withdraw it for investment, housing loan reduction, education etc. Most Malaysian “invests” in their children as the safety net for his retirement. What if the safety net fails to commit to return your retirement income? If you are an employee, you may request HR to divert your annual increment to EPF contribution (max 19% for tax exemption). This is a way of conversion from taxable income to non-taxable income in order to reduce your tax.
Diverted original posting from my facebook note dated 21-Nov-09.
Labels:
Asset Relocation,
Investment Planning,
Sharpe Ratio
Investment Planning: XNPV and XIRR
For uneven cashflow, the best method to calculate the IRR and NPV, excel is the best.
NPV is the net of the discounted CF,j at expected return which relative to present day.
NFV is the net of the compounded CF,j at expected return which relative to future.
Expected return could be risk free rate, inflation, or anything that yu think you need for other evaluation.
This means every project has a NFV and NPV that is use to evaluate the profitability of a project. The project that we discuss here may be investment in equity, UT, real estate, business... that I will share it to you later.
Example 1: A project with 8-years cash flow is tabulated in the table. The table indicates the project have a positive NPV@15% p.a and a positive NFV@15%.
Rules of thumb, based on your expected return input to NPV, said 15%, the discounted for net cashflow produces a positive value. Then, we might accept the project. However, to be specific, IRR has a better meaning than NPV.
IRR is calculated based on the assumption of NPV=0. It is the powerful decision making tool that help me to make the judgment what investment instrument is preferred. IT is termed as CAGR, annualized return, APR, ROI...
However, that was taught from lecturer. I met CFP module 1-6 lecturers, they never mention about XIRR and XNPV. It maybe they do not use XIRR in investment module or maybe they do not even know about EXCEL.
Example 2: In reality, our actual cashflow is complicated (see table 2).The inflow and outflow of a portfolio with different counter are sorted in the table (NOTE: No sorting will return with a wrong IRR, Microsoft shall improve on this XIRR function).Thus, this portfolio has a positive NPV at expected return 15% p.a CAGR. Now, date of transaction is considered in calculation too. You have to liquidate your portfolio, said now.
XIRR is higher than my expected return 15% CAGR but in CFP, lesser than 12% is recommended in calculation. In bullish market, IRR of an aggressive portfolio could simply over 30% p.a, while in bearish it could even lower than -15% p.a We use IRR to compare with the economic indicator not direct return. Direct return has not specific time frame.
Example 3: Bond's coupon rate versus yield-to-maturity. To calculate the CAGR, we all use XIRR for the semiannual coupon. Thus, XIRR takes into the consideration of actual date payment while YTM assumes 360 days a year, or 30 days a month.
Example 4: Project A, B and C comparison.
Obviously,IRR evaluation for the uneven cashflow indicates project A has higher IRR than others. This is how decision is made.
Example 5: Deferred Annuity
You will surprise that the example of the deferred annuity will have a slightly higher IRR that FD rate. However, the only advantages that it could provide is the insurance component built-in inside the policy. For cost effectiveness, UT+termed life maybe have a better return then the annuity.
For 1ook investment, IRR,low = 1.63%, IRR,high = 4.76%, IRR,- = 1.34%
Total,low = RM151,972, Total,high = RM 422,917, Total,- = 140,000.
How about I put 100k to FD and I withdraw 7k yearly at my age 56?
so, what do you think about this annuity product? hmmm.... does your agent know about the fact? hmmm....
Example 6: Have you ever heard about the crab breeding? How NPV and IRR are used in the decision making. Crab breeding is just a background. Capture all the inflow and outflow that expected in the operation. Budget for the business, duration, escape plan .... can be considered inside the plan.
From the plan, you would notice that you have no income that can last for at least 6 months!!! So then you enjoy the value of IRR!!!
NPV is the net of the discounted CF,j at expected return which relative to present day.
NFV is the net of the compounded CF,j at expected return which relative to future.
Expected return could be risk free rate, inflation, or anything that yu think you need for other evaluation.
This means every project has a NFV and NPV that is use to evaluate the profitability of a project. The project that we discuss here may be investment in equity, UT, real estate, business... that I will share it to you later.
Example 1: A project with 8-years cash flow is tabulated in the table. The table indicates the project have a positive NPV@15% p.a and a positive NFV@15%.
Rules of thumb, based on your expected return input to NPV, said 15%, the discounted for net cashflow produces a positive value. Then, we might accept the project. However, to be specific, IRR has a better meaning than NPV.
IRR is calculated based on the assumption of NPV=0. It is the powerful decision making tool that help me to make the judgment what investment instrument is preferred. IT is termed as CAGR, annualized return, APR, ROI...
However, that was taught from lecturer. I met CFP module 1-6 lecturers, they never mention about XIRR and XNPV. It maybe they do not use XIRR in investment module or maybe they do not even know about EXCEL.
Example 2: In reality, our actual cashflow is complicated (see table 2).The inflow and outflow of a portfolio with different counter are sorted in the table (NOTE: No sorting will return with a wrong IRR, Microsoft shall improve on this XIRR function).Thus, this portfolio has a positive NPV at expected return 15% p.a CAGR. Now, date of transaction is considered in calculation too. You have to liquidate your portfolio, said now.
XIRR is higher than my expected return 15% CAGR but in CFP, lesser than 12% is recommended in calculation. In bullish market, IRR of an aggressive portfolio could simply over 30% p.a, while in bearish it could even lower than -15% p.a We use IRR to compare with the economic indicator not direct return. Direct return has not specific time frame.
Example 3: Bond's coupon rate versus yield-to-maturity. To calculate the CAGR, we all use XIRR for the semiannual coupon. Thus, XIRR takes into the consideration of actual date payment while YTM assumes 360 days a year, or 30 days a month.
Example 4: Project A, B and C comparison.
Obviously,IRR evaluation for the uneven cashflow indicates project A has higher IRR than others. This is how decision is made.
Example 5: Deferred Annuity
You will surprise that the example of the deferred annuity will have a slightly higher IRR that FD rate. However, the only advantages that it could provide is the insurance component built-in inside the policy. For cost effectiveness, UT+termed life maybe have a better return then the annuity.
For 1ook investment, IRR,low = 1.63%, IRR,high = 4.76%, IRR,- = 1.34%
Total,low = RM151,972, Total,high = RM 422,917, Total,- = 140,000.
How about I put 100k to FD and I withdraw 7k yearly at my age 56?
so, what do you think about this annuity product? hmmm.... does your agent know about the fact? hmmm....
Example 6: Have you ever heard about the crab breeding? How NPV and IRR are used in the decision making. Crab breeding is just a background. Capture all the inflow and outflow that expected in the operation. Budget for the business, duration, escape plan .... can be considered inside the plan.
From the plan, you would notice that you have no income that can last for at least 6 months!!! So then you enjoy the value of IRR!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)